Photoshopped or not?

Hmmm, well, here is a photo of a girl in a Victoria's Secret romper (which btw I like and would wear, though at nearly 50 I might look a bit silly)... that supposedly is photoshopped according to PSD Photoshop Disasters:



Now supposedly her legs are too far apart where they come out of the pant legs, indicating that her hips have been erased in photoshop in a very amateur manner. A few dissenters in the comments say, no, the jumper hangs low.

Exactly. I really couldn't resist downloading it and sketching in where her body would be. Her waist is where her elbows are, like everyone's waist and elbows. Which puts the "waistband" down by her bikini line. And her legs... jeesh people commenting, women ARE capable of standing with their feet apart. I know they try to make it "common knowledge" that women are only capable of spreading their legs for men, and other than that their thighs go STRAIGHT DOWN as they never separate their ankles more than a foot apart, but no, they can also plant their feet on the sand of a beach!



So there ya go. If anyone really thinks I have done a bad job of drawing in her body, do let me know. On other points, yes other commenter, it is annoying they lined the top of her white top with the sea horizon line. And of course they probably DID photoshop out every possible conceivable blemish. But no, her legs are NOT too far apart to be true. thanks.